FATHERHOOD OF JAVANESE LOW-MIDDLE CLASS: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutic Approach

  • M. Wahib Sahie IAIN Ternate, Indonesia
Keywords: narrative identity, fatherhood, Javanese man, low-middle class

Abstract

This study aims to explore the masculine identity of the fatherhood of Javanese men and to understand its psychological dynamics through ‘the experience of being a father’. Therefore, the researcher applied hermeneutic-phenomenology study that which is digging beneath the configuration inside and also construct the gender structure. Also, in this study the subject of researchers came from Java residing in Jomblang Karang Bendo and in this study are those who are in the category of low-middle class. The findings in this study explain that fatherhood is constructed through discourse which is a requirement of the engendered fatherhood. Furthermore, fatherhood is a figure needed in the family (wife and children).

References:

  • Auslander, L. (1997). Do Women’s Feminist Men’s Lesbian and Gay Queer Studies, Gender Studies? Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9 (3).
  • Beitel, A.H and Parke, R.D. (1998). Involvement in infancy: The role of maternal and paternal atitudes. Journal of Family Psychology, 12 (2), 268-288.
  • Brod, Harry (ed), (1987). “Tha Making of Masculinities, The New Men’s Studies”, Boston: Allen & Unwin.
  • Burgess, A (1997). Fatherhood Reclaimed: The Making of the Modern Father. London: Vermilion.
  • Coles, T     (2009). Negatiating the field of Mascukulity: The production and reproduction of multiple dominant Masculinity: Journal Men and Masculinity 12 (1).
  • Coltrane, S, and Parke. Ross D. (1998). Reinventing Fatherhood: Toward an Historical Understanding of Continuity and Change in men’s Family Lives. Philadelphia, PA: National Center on Fathers and Families.
  • Connell, R (2009). Gender in World Perspective. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Connell, R.    (2005). Masculinities. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Connell, RW (1995). Masculinity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Coverman, S (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. Journal Sociology Quarterly, 26, 81-97.
  • Deutsch, F.M., Lussier, J.B., & Servis, L.J. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal partisipation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65.
  • Dolan, A   (2011). “I”ve Learnt What a Dad Shoul Do: The Interaction of Masculinity and Fathering Indentitas Among Men Who Attended a ‘Dads Only’ Parenting Programme. SAGE. Journal Sociologi. University of Wawick.
  • Featherstone, B (2009). Contemporary Fathering. Theory, Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Flood, M.  (2002). Between Men and Masculinities: An Assessment of the Term “Masculinity” in Recent Scholarship on Men, dalam Pearce, S. & Muller, V. (eds). Manning the Next Millennium: Studies in Masculinities. Bentley: Black Swan Press.
  • Frost, N.   (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology: Combining Core Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gadamer, H.G. (2004). Truth and Method. Second, Revised Edition. Terjemahan: Wheinsheimer, J. & Marshall, D.G. London: Continuum.
  • Gregory, A and Milner, S (2011). What is “new” Abaut Fatherhood. Men and Masculinity. Journal University Of BATH.
  • Hasyim, N, Kurniawan P, Aditya dan Nur Hayati, E. (2011). Menjadi Laki-Laki (Pandangan laki-laki jawa tentang maskulinitas dan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga). Penerbit Rifka Annisa. Yogyakarta.
  • Haywood, Chris, and Máirtín Mac an Ghaill. (2003). Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research and Social Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Hobson, B (2002). Introduction. In Making men into fathers. Men, Masculinity and the social politics of fatherhood, 1-21, eds B. Hobson and D. Martin. Camridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Howson, R. (2006). Challenging Hegemonic Masculinity. London: Routledge.
  • Husserl, E.    (1967). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Terjemahan: Cairns, D. The Hague:  Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.
  • Ibung, D. (2009). Mengembangkan Nilai Moral Pada Anak. Penerbit Alax Media Komputindo. Jakarta.
  • Jenkins, R.     (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
  • Kimmel, M. & Messner, M. (2007). “Introduction” dalam Men’s Lives. 7th edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Kimmel, M. S. (2011). The Gendered Society. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Krais, B     (2006). Gender, Sociological Theory and Bourdieu’s Sociology of Practice. Theory, Culture & Society 23(6).
  • Lamb, ME (ed). (1997). The Role of the Father in Child Development. Edition. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • LaRossa, R (1988). The Modernization of Fatherhood: A Social and Political History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marsiglio, W and Cohan Mark. (2000). Contextualizing Father Involvement and Paternal Influence. Journal Marriage & Family Review 29(2–3).
  • Miller, Tina. (2011). Making Sense of Fatherhood, Gender, Caring and Work. Cambridge University Press. New York.
  • Muzir, Ridwan Inyiak. (2016). Hermeneutika Filosofis Hans-Georg Gadamer. Penerbit AR-RUZZ MEDIA. Yogyakarta.
  • Poerwandari, E.K. (2013). Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk Penelitian Perilaku Manusia. Cetakan kelima. Jakarta: LPSP3 UI.
  • Ricoeur, P.     (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Terjemahan:  Thompson, J.B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-10-24
How to Cite
Sahie, M. (2019). FATHERHOOD OF JAVANESE LOW-MIDDLE CLASS: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutic Approach. Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity, 1(1), 103-120. Retrieved from https://jurnal.lp2msasbabel.ac.id/index.php/psc/article/view/884