Subjective Well-Being Among Students Experiencing Broken Home: Case Study in Islamic Modern Boarding School
Abstract
Students with broken home family conditions do not close the possibility that they have high subjective well-being. It is because each individual has a different perspective of self-acceptance and a different view of happiness for himself. Each individual has factors that contribute to the subjective condition of his well-being. This study aims to identify and describe the subjective well-being of teenagers experiencing broken homes in Darul Hikmah Islamic Modern Boarding School. This study uses a qualitative evaluation with a case study method, the subjects in this study are single subjects teenagers, and daughters who are experiencing broken home. This is evident from the cognitive aspects, positive effects, and negative effects found by the researchers. Several factors also influence the subjective well-being of the subject, including internal factors including emotional intelligence, gratitude and patience, self-acceptance, religiousness, and forgiveness. There are also external factors including social support, relationships with parents, economic factors, quality of education, and school.
Downloads
References
Alifa, N., & Kamila, A. (2023). Rasa syukur dan psychologycal well-being pedagang pasar tradisional. PSYCOMEDIA: Jurnal Psikologi, 3(1), 9–15.
Ardilla, & Cholid, N. (2021). Pengaruh broken home terhadap anak. STUDIA: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32923/stu.v6i1.1968
Astuti, Y., & Anganthi, N. R. N. (2016). Subjective well-being pada remaja dari keluarga broken home. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 17(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v17i2.2508
Azra, F. N. (2023). Forgiveness dan subjective well-being dewasa awal atas perceraian orang tua pada masa remaja. PSIKOBORNEO, Universitas Mulawarma, 5, 529–540.
Boutwell, B. B., & Beaver, K. M. (2010). The role of broken homes in the development of self-control: A propensity score matching approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.018
Compton, W. C., & Hoffman, E. (2019). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and flourishing. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (iv). Pustaka Pelajar.
Diener, E. (2009). Culture and well-being: The collected works of ed diener (vol. 38). Springer Science & Business Media.
Fatonah, F., & Husna, A. N. (2020). Skala penerimaan diri: Konstruk dan analisis psikometri. Prosiding University Research Colloquium, 200–208.
Fisabilillah, S. D., & Agustina, M. T. (2024). Psychological well–being pada remaja dari keluarga broken home. 14–26.
Gil-Lacruz, M., Saz-Gil, M. I., & Gil-Lacruz, A. I. (2019). Benefits of older volunteering on wellbeing: An international comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(December), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02647
Khoiroh, T., Arisanti, K., & N, K. M. (2022). Dampak keluarga broken home terhadap perilaku sosial anak di desa liprak kidul kecamatan banyuanyar kabupaten probolinggo. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 5(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v5i2.9958
Kurniawan, S. R., & Eva, N. (2020). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial dengan kesejahteraan psikologis pada mahasiswa rantau. Seminar Nasional Psikologi Dan Ilmu Humaniora (SENAPIH), 1(1).
Makino, Y., & Tagami, F. (1998). Subjective well-being and self-acceptance. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 69(2), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.69.143
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third). USA: SAGE Publications.
Mohajan, D., & Mohajan, H. K. (2023). Straussian grounded theory: An evolved variant in qualitative research. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 2(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.56397/sssh.2023.02.06
Mujamiasih, M., Prihastuty, R., & Hariyadi, S. (2013). Subjective well-being (swb): Studi indigenous karyawan bersuku jawa. Journal Of Social and Industrial Psychology, 2(2), 36–42. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/sip
Munthe, A. S. T. B., Mandang, J. H., & Kumaat, T. D. (2023). Subjective well being mahasiswa yang orangtuanya berpisah (studi pada mahasiswa di program studi psikologi, universitas negeri manado). PSIKOPEDIA, 4(4), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.53682/pj.v4i4.7669
Naraha, H. C., Sholehah, N., Anggelo, C., Budisantoso, K. N., & Widanarti, M. (2022). Penerimaan diri dan kesejahteraan subjektif pada mahasiswa selama pandemi covid-19. Generasi Berjiwa Sociopreneur, Sinergis, Dan Produktif.
Nurfadilatul Ilmiyah. (2022). Subjective well-being pada remaja santri broken home di pondok pesantren darussalam putri utara blokagung tegalsari banyuwangi.
Safitri, A. R. (2019). Dinamika subjective well-being anak dari keluarga broken home.
Santrock, J. W. (2019). Life-span development 17th ed. Mc Graw Hill Education.
Sari, Y. (2021). Hubungan antara kematangan emosi dan religiusitas dengan penyesuaian diri pada mahasiswa perantau di asrama daerah mahasiswa yogyakarta. Indonesian Psychological Research, 3(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v3i2.548
Schiffrin, H. H., & Nelson, S. K. (2010). Stressed and happy? Investigating the relationship between happiness and perceived stress. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 33–39.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r&d ( 2nd ed). In Data Kualitatif.
Sun, Y. (2023). Happiness and mental health of older adults: Multiple mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(April), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108678
Triyuliasari, A., & Mubarok, A. S. (2024). Self-adjustment in modern islamic boarding schools: A study of self-regulation and religiosity among students. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Dan Budaya, 7(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v7i1.28982
Utami, M. S. (2012). Religiusitas, koping religius, dan kesejahteraan subjektif. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(1), 46–66.
Copyright (c) 2024 Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The Psychosophia: Journal of Psychology, Religion, and Humanity is under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) License, according to which:
1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) that allows the sharing of articles published with the acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2) The authors are authorized to make additional contracts separately for distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (for example, publication in an institutional repository or as a chapter of the book), as long as there is recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3) Authors are authorized and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their personal pages) at any time before or during the editorial process, as it increases the impact and reference of the published work.
